Helck v. Reinheimer

2 Silv. Ct. App. 592, 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 929
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Helck v. Reinheimer. Read the opinion of the Court — 105 N.Y. 470
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 22, 1890·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We dismiss this appeal because the order is not final. It leaves the right involved to the future action of the supreme court, and having been irregularly-entered without the authority of that court was liable to be vacated, and we must either affirm the order or dismiss the appeal. The latter remedy will leave the ultimate question open to the privilege conferred by the general term, since the remittitur from this court awarded costs of the appeal in this court, and went no further than that.

Appeal dismissed with costs.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Helck v. Reinheimer, 2 Silv. Ct. App. 592, 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 929 (N.Y. 1890).

2 Silv. Ct. App. 592 (Helck v. Reinheimer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.