Helck v. Reinheimer

New York Court of Appeals

Helck v. Reinheimer

2 Silv. Ct. App. 592, 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 929

DecidedApril 22, 1890

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Silv. Ct. App. 592 (Helck v. Reinheimer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Helck v. Reinheimer, 2 Silv. Ct. App. 592, 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 929 (N.Y. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We dismiss this appeal because the order is not final. It leaves the right involved to the future action of the supreme court, and having been irregularly-entered without the authority of that court was liable to be vacated, and we must either affirm the order or dismiss the appeal. The latter remedy will leave the ultimate question open to the privilege conferred by the general term, since the remittitur from this court awarded costs of the appeal in this court, and went no further than that.

Appeal dismissed with costs.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We dismiss this appeal because the order is not final. It leaves the right involved to the future action of the supreme court, and having been irregularly-entered without the authority of that court was liable to be vacated, and we must either affirm the order or dismiss the appeal. The latter remedy will leave the ultimate question open to the privilege conferred by the general term, since the remittitur from this court awarded costs of the appeal in this court, and went no further than that.

Appeal dismissed with costs.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Silv. Ct. App. 592, 30 N.Y. St. Rep. 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/helck-v-reinheimer-ny-1890.