Hejl v. Wirth

343 S.W.2d 226, 161 Tex. 609, 4 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 223, 1961 Tex. LEXIS 667
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 25, 1961
DocketA-7833
StatusPublished
Cited by83 cases

This text of 343 S.W.2d 226 (Hejl v. Wirth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hejl v. Wirth, 343 S.W.2d 226, 161 Tex. 609, 4 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 223, 1961 Tex. LEXIS 667 (Tex. 1961).

Opinions

Mr. Justice Greenhill

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question here is whether the last call in a deed shall be followed as a straight line or whether it is to be held to be a meander line and to run along the thread of a stream. The trial court held the call to be a meander line as a matter of law. That judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals, one judge dissenting, 334 S.W. 2d 498. We here reverse the judgments of both courts and hold that as a matter of law the call is for a straight line.

The suit was brought by Mrs. Wirth and others as an ordinary [610]*610trespass to try title suit to recover title and possession to a tract of 72 acres of land in Travis County. The plaintiffs did not claim title by limitations. The defendant Hejl answered with a plea of not guilty and with pleas of limitation. He filed a quitclaim to all of the land described in the plaintiffs’ petition except the 6 acres, more or less, indicated on the map below. That 6 acres in the subject of this litigation.

It has long been the rule in this State that in a trespass to try title suit, the plaintiff must recover upon the strength of his own title. Kaufman v. Shellworth, 64 Texas 179; Hovel v. Kaufman, Com. App. 1926, 280 S.W. 185; Davis v. Gale, (1960), 160 Texas 309, 330 S.W. 2d 610. If the plaintiff under the circumstances fails to establish his title, the effect of a judgment of take nothing against him is to vest title in the defendant. The rule is a harsh one, but it also has been well established as a rule of land law in this State. French v. Olive, (1887), 67 Texas 400, 3 S.W. 568; Permian Oil Co. v. Smith (1934), 129 Texas 413, 73 S.W. 2d 490, 111 A.L.R. 1152.

Hodge is a common source of title. To establish her title to the land in question, the plaintiff Wirth introduced a deed from Hodge to Miller, her predecessor in title, dated 1878. A scaled map of the area in dispute is set out in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, 334 S.W. 2d 500, at 501. The diagram set out below is not drawn to scale but is set out for illustrative purposes and so that the calls in the deed under which Mrs. Wirth et al. claim may be more easily followed.

[611]*611

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ConocoPhillips Co. v. Ramirez
534 S.W.3d 490 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2017)
Toni Combest and Mountain Laurel Minerals, LLC v. Mustang Minerals, LLC
502 S.W.3d 173 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016)
Miller v. Citimortgage, Inc.
970 F. Supp. 2d 568 (N.D. Texas, 2013)
Hurd v. Bac Home Loans Servicing, LP
880 F. Supp. 2d 747 (N.D. Texas, 2012)
KENNEDY CON., INC. v. Forman
316 S.W.3d 129 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010)
Lile v. Smith
291 S.W.3d 75 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009)
Session v. Woods
206 S.W.3d 772 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Clements v. Corbin
891 S.W.2d 276 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)
State v. Brazos River Harbor Navigation District
831 S.W.2d 539 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
Yzaguirre v. Medrano
786 S.W.2d 88 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Bacon v. Jordan
763 S.W.2d 395 (Texas Supreme Court, 1988)
Jordan v. Bacon
739 S.W.2d 629 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Logan v. First Bank of Houston
736 S.W.2d 923 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Logan v. First Bank of Houston, Tex.
736 S.W.2d 927 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
343 S.W.2d 226, 161 Tex. 609, 4 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 223, 1961 Tex. LEXIS 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hejl-v-wirth-tex-1961.