Heist v. Blaisdell
48 A. 259, 198 Pa. 377, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 792
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 18, 1901
DocketAppeal, No. 419
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 48 A. 259 (Heist v. Blaisdell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Heist v. Blaisdell, 48 A. 259, 198 Pa. 377, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 792 (Pa. 1901).
Opinion
A careful perusal of all the testimony in the case, of the charge of the court and of the numerous specifications of error, has not disclosed adequate cause for setting aside the judgment and verdict and ordering a new trial. We therefore dismiss the twenty-five specifications of error and affirm the judgment entered by the learned court below.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Arnstein v. Porter
154 F.2d 464 (Second Circuit, 1946)
Rossmassler v. Spielberger
112 A. 876 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
48 A. 259, 198 Pa. 377, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heist-v-blaisdell-pa-1901.