Heist v. Blaisdell
48 A. 259, 198 Pa. 377, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 792
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 18, 1901·No. Appeal, No. 419·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
A careful perusal of all the testimony in the case, of the charge of the court and of the numerous specifications of error, has not disclosed adequate cause for setting aside the judgment and verdict and ordering a new trial. We therefore dismiss the twenty-five specifications of error and affirm the judgment entered by the learned court below.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heist v. Blaisdell, 48 A. 259, 198 Pa. 377, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 792 (Pa. 1901).
48 A. 259 (Heist v. Blaisdell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Arnstein v. Porter
154 F.2d 464 (Second Circuit, 1946)
Rossmassler v. Spielberger
112 A. 876 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)