Heinemann Agency, Inc. v. Ghezzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Heinemann Agency, Inc. v. Ghezzi

49 A.D.2d 747

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 49 A.D.2d 747 (Heinemann Agency, Inc. v. Ghezzi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heinemann Agency, Inc. v. Ghezzi, 49 A.D.2d 747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of Secretary of State John P. Lomenzo, dated December 20, 1973, which restricted licensed real estate brokers from solicitation for listings of property for purchase or sale in the area of Queens known as Queens Village and in parts of Hollis and Bellerose, petitioners, licensed real estate brokers, appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 18, 1974, which, inter alia, adjudged the said determination legal and binding and dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements (see Thompson v Lomenzo, 78 Misc 2d 298, affd 48 AD2d 869). Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of Secretary of State John P. Lomenzo, dated December 20, 1973, which restricted licensed real estate brokers from solicitation for listings of property for purchase or sale in the area of Queens known as Queens Village and in parts of Hollis and Bellerose, petitioners, licensed real estate brokers, appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 18, 1974, which, inter alia, adjudged the said determination legal and binding and dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements (see Thompson v Lomenzo, 78 Misc 2d 298, affd 48 AD2d 869). Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heinemann-agency-inc-v-ghezzi-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack