Heheman v. E. W. Scripps Co.
668 F.2d 878, 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3294
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided January 7, 1982·No. Nos. 80-3017, 80-3024·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinions
ORDER
A majority of the Court having not voted in favor of an en banc rehearing, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the hearing panel for disposition.
Upon consideration, it is ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be and hereby is denied, 661 F.2d 1115 (6th Cir.).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heheman v. E. W. Scripps Co., 668 F.2d 878, 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3294 (6th Cir. 1982).
668 F.2d 878 (Heheman v. E. W. Scripps Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Midland American Sales—Weintraub, Inc. v. Osram Sylvania, Inc.
874 F. Supp. 164 (N.D. Ohio, 1995)
Bobbie Brooks, Inc. v. International Ladies' Garment Workers Union
835 F.2d 1164 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)
Heheman v. Scripps Company
668 F.2d 878 (Sixth Circuit, 1982)