Hegeman v. Conrad

284 A.D. 969, 134 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4268
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 8, 1954
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 284 A.D. 969 (Hegeman v. Conrad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hegeman v. Conrad, 284 A.D. 969, 134 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4268 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Opinion

In an action to set aside and cancel of record two deeds made by plaintiffs granting to defendant an undivided one-third interest in the fee of two parcels of real property, and for other relief, defendant appeals from so much of an order as sets aside a stipulation settling the action, as grants leave to serve an amended complaint, and as restores the action to the Special Term calendar for trial. Defendant appeals from a second order which granted plaintiffs’ motion to vacate and set aside the findings of fact and the judgment which had been made in pursuance of the stipulation of settlement. The first above-[970]*970mentioned order is modified by striking therefrom the first, second and third ordering paragraphs and by substituting in lieu thereof provisions to the effect that plaintiffs’ motion insofar as it seeks to set aside the stipulation, to serve an amended complaint, and to restore the case to the calendar be denied. As so modified, order affirmed. The second above-mentioned order is reversed and the motion to vacate and set aside the findings and judgment is denied. Appellant is to have a single bill of $10 costs and disbursements upon the determination of the appeals. The stipulation of settlement terminated the causes of action and brought into being new liabilities in substitution therefor, and also brought about termination of the litigation. Under the circumstances Special Term was without power to vacate the stipulation and the findings and the judgment upon motion made in the terminated action. (Yonkers Fur Dressing Co. v. Boyal Ins. Co., 247 N. Y. 435; Wolf v. Bergamo, 263 App. Div. 825.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1053.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanchez v. Brendza
62 A.D.2d 953 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hallock v. State
58 A.D.2d 67 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Monasebian v. Du Bois
30 A.D.2d 839 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
Hunt v. Brodsky Furniture Co.
13 Misc. 2d 751 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
McManus v. New York Telephone Co.
14 Misc. 2d 22 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Cassara v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority
5 A.D.2d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)
Cohen v. Cohen
4 A.D.2d 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Liro Textile Co. v. Cohen
6 Misc. 2d 859 (Albany City Court, 1957)
In re the Estate of Casey
6 Misc. 2d 870 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1956)
Hegeman v. Conrad
1 A.D.2d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 A.D. 969, 134 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hegeman-v-conrad-nyappdiv-1954.