Cassara v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority

5 A.D.2d 790, 170 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7161

This text of 5 A.D.2d 790 (Cassara v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cassara v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, 5 A.D.2d 790, 170 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7161 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from so much of an order as denied appellant’s cross motion to rescind a settlement of the action and for other relief. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The aetion having been settled and discontinued, the relief sought by appellant may not be obtained by motion in the terminated aetion (Yonkers Fur Dressing Co. v. Royal Ins. Co., 247 N. Y. 435; Hegeman v. Conrad, 284 App. Div. 969).

Nolan P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yonkers Fur Dressing Co. v. Royal Insurance
160 N.E. 778 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
Hegeman v. Conrad
284 A.D. 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.D.2d 790, 170 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cassara-v-triborough-bridge-tunnel-authority-nyappdiv-1958.