Cassara v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority
5 A.D.2d 790, 170 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7161
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from so much of an order as denied appellant’s cross motion to rescind a settlement of the action and for other relief. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The aetion having been settled and discontinued, the relief sought by appellant may not be obtained by motion in the terminated aetion (Yonkers Fur Dressing Co. v. Royal Ins. Co., 247 N. Y. 435; Hegeman v. Conrad, 284 App. Div. 969).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cassara v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority, 5 A.D.2d 790, 170 N.Y.S.2d 402, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7161 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).
5 A.D.2d 790 (Cassara v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Yonkers Fur Dressing Co. v. Royal Insurance
160 N.E. 778 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
Hegeman v. Conrad
284 A.D. 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1954)