Heflin v. G.R. Hammonds Roofing

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJuly 30, 2008
DocketI.C. NO. 412693.
StatusPublished

This text of Heflin v. G.R. Hammonds Roofing (Heflin v. G.R. Hammonds Roofing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heflin v. G.R. Hammonds Roofing, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2008).

Opinions

***********
On March 17, 2008, plaintiff filed a Motion for Additional Evidence with the Full Commission. On March 24, 2008, defendants filed a response to plaintiff's Motion for *Page 3 Additional Evidence. Attached to plaintiff's motion was Plaintiff's Exhibit 1 to the motion which included the proposed additional evidence to be admitted. The Full Commission has reviewed plaintiff's motion and defendants' response. In the discretion of the undersigned, the following are now admitted into the evidence of record:

1. Pages 1-2 of Plaintiff's Exhibit 1, February 21, 2005 email from Patrician Heflin to Steve Gheen.

2. Page 5 of Plaintiff's Exhibit 1, Facsimile Transmittal from Attorney Mark L. Zientz to Deputy Commissioner Philip Baddour dated May 7, 2007.

3. Pages 6-7 of Plaintiff's Exhibit 1, August 24, 2007 Order by Deputy Commissioner Philip A. Baddour III.

4. Pages 12-20 of Plaintiff's Exhibit 1: October 19, 2007 letter to Deputy Commissioner Baddour from Attorney John D. Elvers, October 19, 2007 letter and attachments to the North Carolina Industrial Commission from Melody L. Hampton, claims adjustor for Amerisafe, letter dated August 23, 2007 to Deputy Commissioner Baddour from Attorney Kathleen Sumner, and a letter dated October 23, 2007 from Attorney John D. Elvers to Deputy Commissioner Baddour including copies of checks payable to Patricia Heflin.

5. October 23, 2007 letter, contained in Defendants' Exhibit A to defendants' response to plaintiff's Motion for Additional Evidence, from Attorney John D. Elvers to Deputy Commissioner Baddor in response to plaintiff's August 23, 2007 correspondence to Deputy Commissioner Baddour.

***********
The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Baddour and the briefs and arguments of the *Page 4 parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties or their representatives. The Full Commission adopts the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Baddour with modifications.

***********
The Full Commission finds as a fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by parties as:

STIPULATIONS
1. All parties are before the Commission and the Commission has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter.

2. On April 2, 2004, an employee-employer relationship existed between deceased-employee, Claude Heflin, Jr., and employer-defendant.

3. On April 2, 2004, American Interstate Insurance Company was the insurance carrier at risk for payment of workers' compensation claims for employer-defendant's employees, including deceased-employee.

4. At the hearing of this matter before the deputy commissioner, the parties agreed that the deputy commissioner would make an award of benefits based upon an average weekly wage of $387.50, yielding a compensation rate of $258.46, with plaintiffs reserving the right to file a Form 33 seeking an increase in the average weekly wage to be applied to all past and future benefits, unless the parties were able to reach a stipulation as to average weekly wage. Following the hearing before the deputy commissioner, the parties did not submit a stipulation as to average weekly wage.

5. Pursuant to e-mail correspondence received by the Commission on January 3, 2008, defendants do not object to paying a reasonable fee in the amount of $1,200.00 to N. *Page 5 Victor Farah for his services as Guardian ad Litem for Christopher Heflin and Gregory Heflin. This fee is based upon eight hours of service, including time attending the hearing, at a rate of $150.00 per hour.

***********
Based upon all of the competent evidence of record and reasonable inferences flowing therefrom, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The deceased employee, Claude Heflin, Jr., died as a result of a compensable injury by accident during his employment with employer-defendant on April 2, 2004. Defendants acknowledged compensability of this claim and requested a hearing to determine dependency.

2. The deceased employee was employed by G.R. Hammonds Roofing in North Carolina and, at the time of his death, was working on a job site in Florida.

3. The deceased employee was survived by a widow, Patricia Heflin, and four children, Christopher Heflin, Andrew Heflin, Claude Heflin, III, and Lowell Heflin. Gregory Heflin, a potential dependent, is not the biological child of the deceased employee.

4. Plaintiff Patricia Heflin (formerly Patricia Corbett) and the deceased employee were married at the time of the deceased employee's death on April 4, 2004. Patricia Heflin bore no children.

5. Patricia Heflin, through counsel, filed a North Carolina Industrial Commission Form 18 Notice of Accident and Claim on June 22, 2004.

6. On January 10, 2005, Ms. Heflin filed a Florida Petition for Workers' Compensation Benefits arising out of the death of the deceased employee. *Page 6

7. On March 24, 2005, Ms. Heflin's Florida counsel, Mark Zientz, voluntarily dismissed all Petitions for Benefits filed in Florida for workers' compensation benefits.

8. Ms. Heflin's former North Carolina attorney, Caryn Madison, filed a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Ms. Heflin, but did not file a Motion to Dismiss Ms. Heflin's claim. On March 25, 2005, the Industrial Commission issued an Order allowing Ms. Madison to withdraw as counsel for Ms. Heflin's North Carolina workers' compensation claim. The North Carolina claim was not, and has not been, dismissed.

9. On December 2, 2005, Ms. Heflin filed a wrongful death claim in Florida based on her allegation that the insurer failed to accept or deny the Florida workers' compensation claim.

10. Defendants made payments to Ms. Heflin in the amount of $41.00 per week ($82.00 biweekly) from April 2, 2004 and continuing through the present in connection with her North Carolina workers' compensation claim.

11. Ms. Heflin testified that she accepted and cashed benefit checks from defendants. However at the August 23, 2007 hearing before the deputy commissioner, Ms. Heflin stated in open court that she wishes to renounce her entitlement to future benefits pursuant to the present proceeding before the North Carolina Industrial Commission.

12. Mr. Christopher Heflin was born on November 6, 1984. Christopher Heflin is the son of the deceased employee and Ms. Dawn Heflin, the deceased employee's former wife, who is also deceased. The deceased employee and Ms. Dawn Heflin divorced effective December 16, 1986. N. Victor Farah served as Guardian ad Litem of Christopher Heflin to determine Christopher Heflin's entitlement to death benefits. Christopher Heflin was 19 years old at the *Page 7 time of the deceased employee's death and was not wholly dependant upon the deceased employee.

13. N. Victor Farah also served as Guardian ad Litem of Gregory Heflin to determine Gregory Heflin's entitlement to death benefits. Gregory Heflin is the son of the deceased employee's ex-wife, Dawn Heflin (deceased). Gregory Heflin was born in Pennsylvania and his current whereabouts are unknown. Gregory Heflin was not born during the marriage of deceased employee and Ms. Dawn Heflin, and deceased employee did not acknowledge Gregory Heflin as his child.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hughart v. Dasco Transportation, Inc.
606 S.E.2d 379 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Heflin v. G.R. Hammonds Roofing, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heflin-v-gr-hammonds-roofing-ncworkcompcom-2008.