Heffley v. Poorbaugh
10 A. 12, 7 Sadler 49, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 733
Opinion
This case presented questions of fact. They were submitted [70]*70ío tbe jury in a clear and correct charge. Some extracts disconnected with tbe residue might appear erroneous; but when considered in connection with the whole charge, they are not inaccurate or misleading. We discover no error relating to the admission of evidence, nor in the answers to the points.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heffley v. Poorbaugh, 10 A. 12, 7 Sadler 49, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 733 (Pa. 1887).
10 A. 12 (Heffley v. Poorbaugh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carbonell v. SeatGeek, Inc.
D. Nevada, 2025
Yoe v. United States
D. Arizona, 2019
Ledesma v. Astrue
673 F. Supp. 2d 1016 (C.D. California, 2009)