Carbonell v. SeatGeek, Inc.

D. Nevada

Carbonell v. SeatGeek, Inc.

DecidedFebruary 24, 2025

Docket2:24-cv-02087

StatusUnknown

This text of Carbonell v. SeatGeek, Inc. (Carbonell v. SeatGeek, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carbonell v. SeatGeek, Inc., (D. Nev. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 MARS CARBONELL, Case No. 2:24-cv-02087-JCM-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), Order v. [Docket No. 28] 9] SEATGEEK, INC., 10 Defendant(s). 1] Pending before the Court is Defendant’s unopposed motion to stay discovery pending 12] resolution of its motion to compel arbitration or to dismiss. Docket No. 28. Plaintiff does not 13] oppose the motion to stay discovery. Docket No. 29. In considering the governing standards, see, 141 Arik v. Meyers, 2020 WL 515843, at *1-2 (D. Nev. Jan. 31, 2020), the Court will permit the 15} stay of discovery. Accordingly, the motion to stay discovery is GRANTED. In the event 16] resolution of the motion to compel arbitration or to dismiss does not end the proceedings here, the 17] parties must file a joint proposed discovery plan or joint status report within 14 days of the issuance 18} of that order. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: February 24, 2025 21 QA Nancy J. oppe 22 United States Magistrate Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 MARS CARBONELL, Case No. 2:24-cv-02087-JCM-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), Order v. [Docket No. 28] 9] SEATGEEK, INC., 10 Defendant(s). 1] Pending before the Court is Defendant’s unopposed motion to stay discovery pending 12] resolution of its motion to compel arbitration or to dismiss. Docket No. 28. Plaintiff does not 13] oppose the motion to stay discovery. Docket No. 29. In considering the governing standards, see, 141 Arik v. Meyers, 2020 WL 515843, at *1-2 (D. Nev. Jan. 31, 2020), the Court will permit the 15} stay of discovery. Accordingly, the motion to stay discovery is GRANTED. In the event 16] resolution of the motion to compel arbitration or to dismiss does not end the proceedings here, the 17] parties must file a joint proposed discovery plan or joint status report within 14 days of the issuance 18} of that order. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: February 24, 2025 21 QA Nancy J. oppe 22 United States Magistrate Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Carbonell v. SeatGeek, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carbonell-v-seatgeek-inc-nvd-2025.