Heckl v. Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Heckl v. Walsh

122 A.D.3d 1252, 995 N.Y.S.2d 519

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 14, 2014

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 122 A.D.3d 1252 (Heckl v. Walsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heckl v. Walsh, 122 A.D.3d 1252, 995 N.Y.S.2d 519 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered April 10, 2013. The order, among other things, denied in part the motions of defendants Frank Panaro, HSBC North America, Inc. and HSBC Bank USA N.A., to dismiss the amended complaint.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Heckl v Walsh ([appeal No. 2] 122 AD3d 1252 [Nov. 14, 2014]).

Present — Smith, J.P, Fahey, Lindley, Whalen and DeJoseph, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered April 10, 2013. The order, among other things, denied in part the motions of defendants Frank Panaro, HSBC North America, Inc. and HSBC Bank USA N.A., to dismiss the amended complaint.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Heckl v Walsh ([appeal No. 2] 122 AD3d 1252 [Nov. 14, 2014]).

Present — Smith, J.P, Fahey, Lindley, Whalen and DeJoseph, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 A.D.3d 1252, 995 N.Y.S.2d 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heckl-v-walsh-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack