Hebert v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

Fifth Circuit

Hebert v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

526 F.2d 936, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12960

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 6, 1976

DocketNo. 74-3296

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 526 F.2d 936 (Hebert v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hebert v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., 526 F.2d 936, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12960 (5th Cir. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60, plaintiff Hebert appeals from the grant of the defendant railroad’s motion for summary judgment. The injury which is the basis of this suit occurred when Hebert was unloading piggyback trailers from a railroad car. At the time of the accident, Hebert was employed by Southern Pacific Transport Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of the railroad.

Under the FELA, a covered railroad is liable for negligently causing the injury or death of any person “while he. is employed” by the railroad. 45 U.S.C. § 51. Convinced that Hebert was not an employee of the railroad within the meaning of the Act, the district court held the FELA inapplicable and granted summary judgment for the railroad. The court’s memorandum decision relied heavily on the reasoning and test employed by the Ninth Circuit in Kelley v. Southern Pacific Co., 486 F.2d 1084 (9th Cir. 1973), a case factually similar to the case at bar.¹ In so doing, the district court rejected the more liberal approach taken by the Fourth Circuit in Smith v. Norfolk & W. Ry., 407 F.2d 501 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 979, 89 S.Ct. 2134, 23 L.Ed.2d 767 (1969). During pendency of this appeal, the United States Supreme Court resolved the apparent conflict in the circuits and approved the approach of the Ninth Circuit. Kelley v. Southern Pacific Co., 419 U.S. 318, 95 S.Ct. 472, 42 L.Ed.2d 498 (1974). In a lengthy opinion by Justice Marshall, the Court clarified and elaborated upon the proper test and ordered Kelley remanded to the district court to enable it to correctly apply the facts of that case to the test therein enunciated.

In the case sub judice, there is no necessity for a remand. The district court accurately forecast the law and correctly applied the now-affirmed standard to the undisputed facts of this case.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In this action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60, plaintiff Hebert appeals from the grant of the defendant railroad’s motion for summary judgment. The injury which is the basis of this suit occurred when Hebert was unloading piggyback trailers from a railroad car. At the time of the accident, Hebert was employed by Southern Pacific Transport Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of the railroad.

Under the FELA, a covered railroad is liable for negligently causing the injury or death of any person “while he. is employed” by the railroad. 45 U.S.C. § 51. Convinced that Hebert was not an employee of the railroad within the meaning of the Act, the district court held the FELA inapplicable and granted summary judgment for the railroad. The court’s memorandum decision relied heavily on the reasoning and test employed by the Ninth Circuit in Kelley v. Southern Pacific Co., 486 F.2d 1084 (9th Cir. 1973), a case factually similar to the case at bar.¹ In so doing, the district court rejected the more liberal approach taken by the Fourth Circuit in Smith v. Norfolk & W. Ry., 407 F.2d 501 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 979, 89 S.Ct. 2134, 23 L.Ed.2d 767 (1969). During pendency of this appeal, the United States Supreme Court resolved the apparent conflict in the circuits and approved the approach of the Ninth Circuit. Kelley v. Southern Pacific Co., 419 U.S. 318, 95 S.Ct. 472, 42 L.Ed.2d 498 (1974). In a lengthy opinion by Justice Marshall, the Court clarified and elaborated upon the proper test and ordered Kelley remanded to the district court to enable it to correctly apply the facts of that case to the test therein enunciated.

In the case sub judice, there is no necessity for a remand. The district court accurately forecast the law and correctly applied the now-affirmed standard to the undisputed facts of this case.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

526 F.2d 936, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hebert-v-southern-pacific-transportation-co-ca5-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack