Heather Travis v. State of Arkansas

2025 Ark. App. 126
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedFebruary 26, 2025
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2025 Ark. App. 126 (Heather Travis v. State of Arkansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heather Travis v. State of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. App. 126 (Ark. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Cite as 2025 Ark. App. 126 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CR-24-414

Opinion Delivered February 26, 2025 HEATHER TRAVIS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE HOT SPRING COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 30CR-17-45] V. HONORABLE STEPHEN L. SHIRRON, STATE OF ARKANSAS JUDGE APPELLEE REMANDED TO SETTLE AND SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD

WENDY SCHOLTENS WOOD, Judge

Heather Travis appeals from a Hot Spring County Circuit Court sentencing order

revoking her probation and sentencing her to 240 months’ imprisonment. 1 On appeal,

Travis challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the revocation. We remand to

settle, if necessary, and supplement the record.

It appears as though Travis pleaded guilty in 2017 to a charge of Class B felony

possession of a controlled substance and received 60 months’ probation. It also appears that

her probation was revoked in 2022 and that she received 48 months’ probation. On February

1 This is a companion case to another case, No. 30CR-17-138, in which Travis had been placed on probation. The circuit court held a combined revocation hearing in both cases but issued separate sentencing orders in each case revoking Travis’s probation. Travis has filed separate appeals, and today we hand down opinions in both. See Travis v. State, 2025 Ark. App. 127. 27, 2024, the State filed an “Amended Petition to Revoke (3rd Amended),” which is where

the record before us begins. Although the conditions of probation entered in regard to the

2022 revocation are in the record, the prior sentencing orders and petitions to revoke are

not. We require the entire record to properly confirm our jurisdiction—to make sure that

the circuit court had the authority to revoke or to determine whether there might be an

illegal-sentence issue. Without the complete record, we cannot do so.

This court has stated that if anything material to either party is omitted from the

record by error or accident, we may direct that the omission be corrected and that a

supplemental record be certified and transmitted. Cockrell v. State, 2023 Ark. App. 430, at 4;

Ark. R. App. P.–Civ. 6(e) (as made applicable to criminal cases by Ark. R. App. P.–Crim.

4(a)). Accordingly, we remand to the circuit court to settle the record, if necessary, and

thereafter supplement the record with the omitted portions, including but not limited to

pleadings and resulting court orders. Travis has thirty days from the date of this opinion to

file a supplemental record with this court.

Remanded to settle and supplement the record.

KLAPPENBACH, C.J., and BARRETT, J., agree.

Gregory Crain, for appellant.

Tim Griffin, Att’y Gen., by: A. Evangeline Bacon, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heather Travis v. State of Arkansas
2025 Ark. App. 127 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 Ark. App. 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heather-travis-v-state-of-arkansas-arkctapp-2025.