Heather Richardson v. Great Expressions Dental Centers of Georgia, P.C.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 26, 2019
DocketA19D0321
StatusPublished

This text of Heather Richardson v. Great Expressions Dental Centers of Georgia, P.C. (Heather Richardson v. Great Expressions Dental Centers of Georgia, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heather Richardson v. Great Expressions Dental Centers of Georgia, P.C., (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ February 14, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0321. HEATHER RICHARDSON et al. v. GREAT EXPRESSIONS DENTAL CENTERS OF GEORGIA, P.C. et al.

Heather and Delson Richardson filed suit against Great Expressions Dental Centers of Georgia, P.C. and Dr. Quoc Tran (collectively, “the defendants”). The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment and, initially, the motion was denied.1 Following a motion for reconsideration, however, the trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants and dismissed the Richardsons’ complaint. The Richardsons then filed this timely application for discretionary review. The dismissal of the Richardsons’ complaint constitutes a final judgment. Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1), a party may file a direct appeal from “[a]ll final judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below, except as provided in Code Section 5-6-35.” Here, no provision of OCGA § 5-6-35, the discretionary appeal statute, appears to apply. Moreover, orders granting summary judgment may be appealed directly; no application is necessary. See OCGA § 9-11-56 (h). If a party timely applies for discretionary review of a directly appealable order, we will grant the application under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Thus, this application for

1 The defendants sought interlocutory review of the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment, but the application was denied. See Case No. A19I0102 (Nov. 27, 2018). discretionary appeal is hereby GRANTED. The Richardsons shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal with the trial court, if they have not already done so.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 02/14/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 5-6-34
Georgia § 5-6-34(a)(1)
§ 5-6-35
Georgia § 5-6-35
§ 9-11-56
Georgia § 9-11-56(h)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Heather Richardson v. Great Expressions Dental Centers of Georgia, P.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heather-richardson-v-great-expressions-dental-centers-of-georgia-pc-gactapp-2019.