Heath v. Gloster

246 N.W. 494, 261 Mich. 552, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 700
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 16, 1932·No. Docket No. 8, Calendar No. 36,486.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petition for rehearing in the case of Heath v. Gloster,260 Mich. 85, a law action, is denied. Dirr v. Hitchman,260 Mich. 179, is an equity suit involving the equitable claims of the respective parties. These we cannot consider on appeal in a law action where there has been a notice of forfeiture of an executory land contract, followed, after fair trial, by valid judgment for restitution duly entered both by the circuit court commissioner, and, on appeal, by the circuit court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heath v. Gloster, 246 N.W. 494, 261 Mich. 552, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 700 (Mich. 1932).

246 N.W. 494 (Heath v. Gloster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Younglove v. Graham & Hill
526 P.2d 689 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1974)