Heath v. Gloster

Michigan Supreme Court

Heath v. Gloster

246 N.W. 494, 261 Mich. 552, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 700

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 16, 1932

DocketDocket No. 8, Calendar No. 36,486.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 246 N.W. 494 (Heath v. Gloster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heath v. Gloster, 246 N.W. 494, 261 Mich. 552, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 700 (Mich. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition for rehearing in the case of Heath v. Gloster,260 Mich. 85, a law action, is denied. Dirr v. Hitchman,260 Mich. 179, is an equity suit involving the equitable claims of the respective parties. These we cannot consider on appeal in a law action where there has been a notice of forfeiture of an executory land contract, followed, after fair trial, by valid judgment for restitution duly entered both by the circuit court commissioner, and, on appeal, by the circuit court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition for rehearing in the case of Heath v. Gloster,260 Mich. 85, a law action, is denied. Dirr v. Hitchman,260 Mich. 179, is an equity suit involving the equitable claims of the respective parties. These we cannot consider on appeal in a law action where there has been a notice of forfeiture of an executory land contract, followed, after fair trial, by valid judgment for restitution duly entered both by the circuit court commissioner, and, on appeal, by the circuit court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 N.W. 494, 261 Mich. 552, 1932 Mich. LEXIS 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heath-v-gloster-mich-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack