Heath v. Alabama
470 U.S. 1026, 105 S. Ct. 1390, 84 L. Ed. 2d 780, 53 U.S.L.W. 3634, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 1243
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Heath v. Alabama. Read the opinion of the Court — 474 U.S. 82 →
Opinion
Sup. Ct. Ala. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Cer-[1027]*1027tiorari granted limited to Question II. In addition, the parties are requested to address the following question: “What is the applicability, if any, of the dual sovereignty doctrine to successive prosecutions by two different states?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heath v. Alabama, 470 U.S. 1026, 105 S. Ct. 1390, 84 L. Ed. 2d 780, 53 U.S.L.W. 3634, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 1243 (1985).
470 U.S. 1026 (Heath v. Alabama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.