Hearn v. Red Devil Co.
This text of 119 S.E. 469 (Hearn v. Red Devil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where a witness testifies to a fact, the presumption, in the absence of anything to the contrary, is that he is testifying from his own knowledge and recollection. Shaw v. Jones, 133 Ga. 446 (3) (66 S. E. 240); Flint River & Northeastern R. Co. v. Maples, 10 Ga. App. 573 (2) (73 S. E. 957); Atlanta Glass Co. v. Noizet, 88 Ga. 43 (2) (13 S. E. 833). Where a witness testifies to the weights of certain articles weighed by himself, and his testimony is based apparently upon his independent recollection, it is not rendered inadmissible merely because it may appear, without more, that he made a memorandum of the weights at the time, which is not produced. The evidence authorized the finding and judgment rendered by the judge, sitting without a jury, and it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 S.E. 469, 31 Ga. App. 84, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hearn-v-red-devil-co-gactapp-1923.