Heard v. State

67 S.W.2d 312, 125 Tex. Crim. 142, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 15
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 10, 1934·No. No. 16196.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

LATTIMORE, JUDGE.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The statement of facts appears to be filed too late for consideration, but the appeal bond appears to have been filed after the adjournment of- the trial term. It is approved only by the sheriff. The law requires that such bond be approved both by the sheriff and the trial judge. This court is without jurisdiction, and the appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heard v. State, 67 S.W.2d 312, 125 Tex. Crim. 142, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 15 (Tex. 1934).

67 S.W.2d 312 (Heard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Biggins v. State
273 S.W.2d 70 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)
Jones v. State
263 S.W.2d 780 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)