Heard v. State

67 S.W.2d 312, 125 Tex. Crim. 142, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 15
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 10, 1934
DocketNo. 16196.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 67 S.W.2d 312 (Heard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heard v. State, 67 S.W.2d 312, 125 Tex. Crim. 142, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 15 (Tex. 1934).

Opinion

LATTIMORE, JUDGE.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The statement of facts appears to be filed too late for consideration, but the appeal bond appears to have been filed after the adjournment of- the trial term. It is approved only by the sheriff. The law requires that such bond be approved both by the sheriff and the trial judge. This court is without jurisdiction, and the appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Biggins v. State
273 S.W.2d 70 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)
Jones v. State
263 S.W.2d 780 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 S.W.2d 312, 125 Tex. Crim. 142, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heard-v-state-texcrimapp-1934.