Biggins v. State
273 S.W.2d 70, 1954 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2951
Opinion
The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, three days in jail and a fine of $100.
The record does not reflect that appellant entered into a recognizance or filed an appeal bond in the trial court.
In the absence of a proper bond or recognizance on appeal, this Court is without jurisdiction to enter any order except to dismiss the appeal. Cantrell v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 596, 127 S.W.2d 471; Heard v. State, 125 Tex.Cr.R. 142, 67 S.W.2d 312; Faupel v. State, 125 Tex.Cr.R. 430, 68 S.W.2d 1113.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Biggins v. State, 273 S.W.2d 70, 1954 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2951 (Tex. 1954).
273 S.W.2d 70 (Biggins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Faupel v. State
68 S.W.2d 1113 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Heard v. State
67 S.W.2d 312 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Cantrell v. State
126 S.W.2d 965 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Cantrell v. State
127 S.W.2d 471 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1939)