Healey v. Terry

7 N.Y.S. 321, 26 N.Y. St. Rep. 929, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1065
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedOctober 31, 1889
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 N.Y.S. 321 (Healey v. Terry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Healey v. Terry, 7 N.Y.S. 321, 26 N.Y. St. Rep. 929, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1065 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are satisfied that the words stricken put were part of plaintiffs’ Exhibit 3, and cannot be detached therefrom. Where the facts are disputed, the certification of the trial judge as to what occurred is conclusive, (Green v. Shute, ante, 69;) but where the facts are undisputed, or are indisputable, the trial judge cannot arbitrarily strike out evidence regarded by the appellant as material to his appeal, (Rubber Co. v. Rothery, 112 N. Y. 592, 20 N. E. Rep. 546.) The words stricken out formed part of plaintiffs’ Exhibit Ho. 3, and the appellants had the right to have them printed as part and parcel thereof. It follows that the order striking them from the case must be reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goldenson v. Lawrence
20 N.Y.S. 616 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 N.Y.S. 321, 26 N.Y. St. Rep. 929, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/healey-v-terry-nynyccityct-1889.