Goldenson v. Lawrence

City of New York Municipal Court

Goldenson v. Lawrence

1 Misc. 1, 20 N.Y.S. 616, 48 N.Y. St. Rep. 636

CourtCity of New York Municipal Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1892

DocketNo. 1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Misc. 1 (Goldenson v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldenson v. Lawrence, 1 Misc. 1, 20 N.Y.S. 616, 48 N.Y. St. Rep. 636 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Ehrlich, Ch. J.

The court below, on granting leave to amend, had the power to impose such terms as it deemed just (Code, § 723), and'the terms imposed can hardly be called an abuse of discretion; besides the order recites that it was made with consent of the parties. This recital concludes the parties on appeal. Smith v. Grant, 11 Civ. Proc. Rep. 354.

Under the circumstances, the order appealed from must be affirmed with costs.

Van Wyck and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI