Goldenson v. Lawrence

City of New York Municipal Court

Goldenson v. Lawrence

1 Misc. 1, 20 N.Y.S. 616, 48 N.Y. St. Rep. 636

City of New York Municipal Court·Decided October 15, 1892·No. No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Ehrlich, Ch. J.

The court below, on granting leave to amend, had the power to impose such terms as it deemed just (Code, § 723), and'the terms imposed can hardly be called an abuse of discretion; besides the order recites that it was made with consent of the parties. This recital concludes the parties on appeal. Smith v. Grant, 11 Civ. Proc. Rep. 354.

Under the circumstances, the order appealed from must be affirmed with costs.

Van Wyck and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ehrlich, Ch. J.

The court below, on granting leave to amend, had the power to impose such terms as it deemed just (Code, § 723), and'the terms imposed can hardly be called an abuse of discretion; besides the order recites that it was made with consent of the parties. This recital concludes the parties on appeal. Smith v. Grant, 11 Civ. Proc. Rep. 354.

Under the circumstances, the order appealed from must be affirmed with costs.

Van Wyck and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Goldenson v. Lawrence, 1 Misc. 1, 20 N.Y.S. 616, 48 N.Y. St. Rep. 636 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Pincite

1 Misc. 1 (Goldenson v. Lawrence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related