Headwaters Forest Defense v. The County Of Humboldt
This text of 211 F.3d 1121 (Headwaters Forest Defense v. The County Of Humboldt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
211 F.3d 1121 (9th Cir. 2000)
HEADWATERS FOREST DEFENSE, PLAINTIFF, AND MOLLY BURTON; VERNELL "SPRING" M. LUNDBERG; MICHAEL MCCURDY; ERIC SAMUEL NEUWIRTH; MAYA PORTUGAL; LISA MARIE SANDERSONNO. FOX; JENNIFER SCHNEIDER; TERRI SLANETZ; NOEL TENDICK, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; HUMBOLDT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; DENNIS LEWIS, SHERIFF; GARY PHILP, CHIEF DEPUTY; MARVIN KIRKPATRICK, DEPUTY; JOHN SYLVIA, DEPUTY; CIARBELLINI, SGT.; CITY OF EUREKA, A POLITICAL DIVISION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; EUREKA POLICE DEPT; BILL HONSAL, CAPTAIN; JAMES MANOS, SGT., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.
98-17250
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Argued and Submitted December 6, 1999
May 4, 2000
NOTE: SEE AMENDED OPINION AT 240 F.3d 1185.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
211 F.3d 1121, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 4773, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3482, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/headwaters-forest-defense-v-the-county-of-humboldt-ca9-2000.