Home/Ninth Circuit/Headwaters Forest Defense v. The County Of Humboldt

Headwaters Forest Defense v. The County Of Humboldt

211 F.3d 1121, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 4773, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3482, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8772
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Headwaters Forest Defense v. The County Of Humboldt. Read the opinion of the Court — 276 F.3d 1125 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 4, 2000·No. 98-17250·Published

Opinion

211 F.3d 1121 (9th Cir. 2000)

HEADWATERS FOREST DEFENSE, PLAINTIFF, AND MOLLY BURTON; VERNELL "SPRING" M. LUNDBERG; MICHAEL MCCURDY; ERIC SAMUEL NEUWIRTH; MAYA PORTUGAL; LISA MARIE SANDERSONNO. FOX; JENNIFER SCHNEIDER; TERRI SLANETZ; NOEL TENDICK, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; HUMBOLDT COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; DENNIS LEWIS, SHERIFF; GARY PHILP, CHIEF DEPUTY; MARVIN KIRKPATRICK, DEPUTY; JOHN SYLVIA, DEPUTY; CIARBELLINI, SGT.; CITY OF EUREKA, A POLITICAL DIVISION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; EUREKA POLICE DEPT; BILL HONSAL, CAPTAIN; JAMES MANOS, SGT., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

98-17250

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Argued and Submitted December 6, 1999
May 4, 2000

NOTE: SEE AMENDED OPINION AT 240 F.3d 1185.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Headwaters Forest Defense v. The County Of Humboldt, 211 F.3d 1121, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 4773, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3482, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 8772 (9th Cir. 2000).

211 F.3d 1121 (Headwaters Forest Defense v. The County Of Humboldt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Headwaters Forest Defense v. County of Humboldt
211 F.3d 1121 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)