Headly v. Van Ness

3 N.J.L. 723

Opinion

[531]

By the Court.

This is too loose a paper to be treated as a negotiablé instrument. The right of Van Ness, the plaintiff below, to maintain this action against Headly, no way appears by the record of the justice. The state of demand.is in itself absurd and unintelligible; nor will the paper admitted in evidence, help it out.

Judgment reversed.