Headly v. Van Ness

3 N.J.L. 722

Opinion

By the Court.

— This is too loose a paper to be treated as a negociable instrument. The right of Van Ness, the plaintiif below, to maintain this action against Headly, no way appears by the record of the justice. The state of demand is in itself absurd and unintelligible; nor will the paper admitted in evidence, help it out.

Judgment reversed.