Headly v. Van Ness
3 N.J.L. 722
This text of 3 N.J.L. 722 (Headly v. Van Ness) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Headly v. Van Ness, 3 N.J.L. 722 (N.J. 1810).
Opinion
— This is too loose a paper to be treated as a negociable instrument. The right of Van Ness, the plaintiif below, to maintain this action against Headly, no way appears by the record of the justice. The state of demand is in itself absurd and unintelligible; nor will the paper admitted in evidence, help it out.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 N.J.L. 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/headly-v-van-ness-nj-1810.