Head v. Williamson
Opinion
Joseph Marion Head, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion for Rehearing” and his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the denial of the motions was not an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Head v. Williamson, No. CA-02-1460 (S.D.W. Va. filed Oct. 21, 2004; entered Oct. 22, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for acquittal and “10 zillion dollars tax free” is denied.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
127 F. App'x 103 (Head v. Williamson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.