Head v. Williamson
This text of Head v. Williamson (Head v. Williamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7855
JOSEPH MARION HEAD, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TROY WILLIAMSON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. R. Clarke VanDervort, Magistrate Judge. (CA-02-1460)
Submitted: March 25, 2005 Decided: April 8, 2005
Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Marion Head, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Joseph Marion Head, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his “Motion for Rehearing” and his motion for
appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and conclude
that the denial of the motions was not an abuse of discretion.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Head v. Williamson, No. CA-02-1460 (S.D.W. Va. filed
Oct. 21, 2004; entered Oct. 22, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process. The motion for acquittal and “10
zillion dollars tax free” is denied.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Head v. Williamson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/head-v-williamson-ca4-2005.