Head v. Strozier

118 S.E. 757, 30 Ga. App. 674, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 620
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 26, 1923
Docket14696
StatusPublished

This text of 118 S.E. 757 (Head v. Strozier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Head v. Strozier, 118 S.E. 757, 30 Ga. App. 674, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 620 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. There is no merit in the motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions.

2. Where the only assignment of error in a petition for certiorari is that the verdict is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence, and without evidence to support it, and where the evidence adduced upon the trial is legally sufficient to support the verdict returned, this court will not reverse the judgment of the judge of the superior court refusing to sanction the writ of certiorari. Little v. City of Jefferson, 9 Ga. App. 878 (1) (72 S. E. 436); Crawford v. Jones, 27 Ga. App. 448 (108 S. E. 807). Under the above ruling and the facts of the instant case, this court cannot hold that the judge of the superior court erred in refusing to'sanction the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke amd Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Charles J. Graham, for plaintiff in error. Weltner, Cheatham & Sims, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Little v. City of Jefferson
72 S.E. 436 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Crawford v. Jones
108 S.E. 807 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 S.E. 757, 30 Ga. App. 674, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/head-v-strozier-gactapp-1923.