Crawford v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Crawford v. Jones

108 S.E. 807, 27 Ga. App. 448, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 955

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 7, 1921

Docket12174

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 108 S.E. 807 (Crawford v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crawford v. Jones, 108 S.E. 807, 27 Ga. App. 448, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 955 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

While a tenant for an agreed term, after the expiration of his contract, or a tenant at will, after the two months’ statutory-notice by his landlord (Civil Code, of 1910, § 3709), becomes a tenant at sufferance, and continnes as such until there has been some affirmative action by the landlord which has the effect of converting the tenancy into some other form (Willis v. Harrell, 118 Ga. 906, 45 S. E. 794), yet where the undisputed evidence shows that the tenancy was one at will, and the evidence is in conflict as to whether the statutory notice to vacate was given within the required time before the filing of eviction proceedings under sections 5385 et seq. of the Civil Code (1910), the order of a judge of the superior court refusing to sanction a writ of certiorari for review of a judgment for the tenant will not be reversed, when the sole ground of the petition for certiorari is that the judgment was contrary to the evidence. Little v. City of Jefferson, 9 Ga. App. 878 (1) (72 S. E. 436).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Hill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins, P. J.

While a tenant for an agreed term, after the expiration of his contract, or a tenant at will, after the two months’ statutory-notice by his landlord (Civil Code, of 1910, § 3709), becomes a tenant at sufferance, and continnes as such until there has been some affirmative action by the landlord which has the effect of converting the tenancy into some other form (Willis v. Harrell, 118 Ga. 906, 45 S. E. 794), yet where the undisputed evidence shows that the tenancy was one at will, and the evidence is in conflict as to whether the statutory notice to vacate was given within the required time before the filing of eviction proceedings under sections 5385 et seq. of the Civil Code (1910), the order of a judge of the superior court refusing to sanction a writ of certiorari for review of a judgment for the tenant will not be reversed, when the sole ground of the petition for certiorari is that the judgment was contrary to the evidence. Little v. City of Jefferson, 9 Ga. App. 878 (1) (72 S. E. 436).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Hill, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 S.E. 807, 27 Ga. App. 448, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-jones-gactapp-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack