(HC)Caridad v. Black
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 BENJAMIN TABAYOYONG CARIDAD, No. 2:21-cv-00704-WBS-JDP (HC) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On May 9, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 9, 2023, are adopted in full; 28 2. The amended petition, ECF No. 9, is denied; 1 3. The court issues the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253 on the 2 || issue of whether the evidence was sufficient under the standards of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 3 | 307, 316 (1979) and Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 432-33 (1979) to establish that petitioner 4 | continued to represent a substantial danger of physical harm to others; and 5 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case and to enter judgment accordingly. 6 | Dated: July 3, 2023 dite : 4p. AZ k 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(HC)Caridad v. Black ((HC)Caridad v. Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.