(HC) Jacobo v. Stanislaus County Superior Court
This text of (HC) Jacobo v. Stanislaus County Superior Court ((HC) Jacobo v. Stanislaus County Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 ANGELO J JACOBO, IV, Case No. 21-09668 NC (PR)
12 Petitioner, ORDER OF TRANSFER 13 v.
14 STANISLAUS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, 15 Respondent. 16
17 Petitioner, a state prisoner at Gabilan Conservation Camp, has filed a petition for a writ of 18 habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges his state conviction from the 19 Superior Court of Stanislaus County. Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of 20 confinement or the district of conviction. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). However, petitions 21 challenging a conviction or sentence are preferably heard in the district of conviction. See Habeas 22 L.R. 2254-3(b)(1); Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). Here, because 23 petitioner challenges a conviction from Stanislaus County, the Eastern District of California is the 24 district of conviction. 25 26 1 Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the 2 Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The Clerk shall terminate all pending 3 motions and transfer the entire file to the Eastern District of California. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 DATED: January 3, 2022 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS 6 United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
(HC) Jacobo v. Stanislaus County Superior Court, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hc-jacobo-v-stanislaus-county-superior-court-caed-2022.