(HC) Gonzalez v. St. Andre

E.D. California

(HC) Gonzalez v. St. Andre

DecidedMarch 14, 2024

Docket2:24-cv-00810

StatusUnknown

This text of (HC) Gonzalez v. St. Andre ((HC) Gonzalez v. St. Andre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

(HC) Gonzalez v. St. Andre, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOSE A. GONZALEZ, Case No. 24-cv-00728-JST g Petitioner, ORDER OF TRANSFER 9 v. 10 ROB ST. ANDRE, Warden ll Respondent. 12

13 Petitioner, an inmate housed at High Desert State Prison, in Susanville, California has filed 14 || this pro se action seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his 3 15 || conviction for first-degree murder and intentional discharge of a firearm causing great bodily a 16 || injury or death. See generally ECF No. 1. Petitioner’s conviction was obtained in Solano County 3 17 and he is incarcerated in Lassen County, both of which lie within the Eastern District of 18 || California. Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district 19 || of conviction. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). A petition challenging a conviction or the sentence imposed 20 || is preferably heard in the district of conviction. See N.D. Cal. Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b); see also 21 || Dannenberg v. Ingle, 831 F.Supp. 767, 768 (N.D. Cal. 1993). Here, Petitioner was convicted and 22 sentenced, and is currently confined, in the Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 84(b). 23 || Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern 24 District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The Clerk is directed to close this case. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: March 14, 2024 . .

27 JON S. TIGAR 28 nited States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOSE A. GONZALEZ, Case No. 24-cv-00728-JST g Petitioner, ORDER OF TRANSFER 9 v. 10 ROB ST. ANDRE, Warden ll Respondent. 12

13 Petitioner, an inmate housed at High Desert State Prison, in Susanville, California has filed 14 || this pro se action seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his 3 15 || conviction for first-degree murder and intentional discharge of a firearm causing great bodily a 16 || injury or death. See generally ECF No. 1. Petitioner’s conviction was obtained in Solano County 3 17 and he is incarcerated in Lassen County, both of which lie within the Eastern District of 18 || California. Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district 19 || of conviction. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). A petition challenging a conviction or the sentence imposed 20 || is preferably heard in the district of conviction. See N.D. Cal. Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b); see also 21 || Dannenberg v. Ingle, 831 F.Supp. 767, 768 (N.D. Cal. 1993). Here, Petitioner was convicted and 22 sentenced, and is currently confined, in the Eastern District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 84(b). 23 || Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern 24 District of California. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The Clerk is directed to close this case. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: March 14, 2024 . .

27 JON S. TIGAR 28 nited States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

(HC) Gonzalez v. St. Andre, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hc-gonzalez-v-st-andre-caed-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack