(HC) Garcia v. Warden Taylor

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN GARCIA IV, No. 1:24-cv-01044-KES-SAB (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING 13 v. RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF 14 WARDEN TAYLOR, HABEAS CORPUS, AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE 15 Respondent. Docs. 12, 14 16 17 18 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On April 15, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 22 that recommended granting respondent’s motion to dismiss and dismissing the petition. Doc. 14. 23 The findings and recommendations were served on petitioner and contained notice that any 24 objections thereto were to be filed within thirty days after service. To date, no objections have 25 been filed, and the time for doing so has passed. 26 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has conducted a de 27 novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court holds the findings 28 and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis. 1 In the event a notice of appeal is filed, a certificate of appealability will not be required 2 | because this is an order denying a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, 3 | nota final order in a habeas proceeding in which the detention complained of arises out of 4 | process issued by a state court. Forde v. U.S. Parole Commission, 114 F.3d 878 (9th Cir. 1997); 5 | see Ojo v. INS, 106 F.3d 680, 681-82 (Sth Cir. 1997); Bradshaw v. Story, 86 F.3d 164, 166 (10th 6 | Cir. 1996). 7 Accordingly: 8 1. The findings and recommendations issued on April 15, 2025, Doc. 14, are ADOPTED 9 in full; 10 2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss, Doc. 12, is GRANTED; 11 3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; and 12 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 13 14 15 | IT IS SO ORDERED. _ 16 Dated: _ June 19, 2025 4h UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28