(HC) (DP) Holt v. Brown

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedJanuary 7, 2025
Docket1:97-cv-06210
StatusUnknown

This text of (HC) (DP) Holt v. Brown ((HC) (DP) Holt v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
(HC) (DP) Holt v. Brown, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

1 2 3

5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 JOHN LEE HOLT, Case No. 1:97-cv-06210-KES

12 Petitioner, DEATH PENALTY CASE

13 v. ORDER (1) GRANTING PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO 14 OAK SMITH, Warden of San Quentin SUBSTITUTE RESPONDENT, and (2) State Prison,1 DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE 15 COURT TO SUBSTITUTE THE NAME Respondent. OF WARDEN SIRCOYA M. WILLIAMS 16 FOR WARDEN OAK SMITH AS NAMED RESPONDENT 17

18 19 On December 18, 2024, Petitioner John Lee Holt, through appointed counsel Robert 20 Myers Esq. and the Office of the Federal Defender for the Eastern District of California by 21 Assistant Federal Defenders Harry Simon and Jennifer Mann, moved to substitute Daniel E. 22 Cueva, Warden of the California Medical Facility at Vacaville, as the respondent in this action 23 in place of Oak Smith, Warden of San Quentin State Prison.2 24

25 1 The Court takes notice that Chance Andes is the Acting Warden at San Quentin Rehabilitation Center (formerly San Quentin State Prison). See www.cdcr.ca.gov/facility-locator/sqrc/ last visited January 3, 2025; Fed. R. Evid. 201. Threshold Enterprises Ltd. v. Pressed Juicery, Inc., 445 F. Supp. 3d 139, 146 (N.D. Cal. 2020) (In general, 26 websites and their contents may be judicially noticed.)

27 2 The Court takes notice that Sircoya Williams was appointed Acting Warden of California Medical Facility beginning December 20, 2024. See www.cdcr.ca.gov/facility-locator/sqrc/ last visited January 3, 2025; Fed. R. 1 Counsel for Petitioner advise that counsel for Respondent, Deputy Attorney General 2 Sean McCoy, has no objection to the motion. 3 The Court, having reviewed Petitioner’s motion, the record, and the controlling law will 4 grant substitution of Sircoya M. Williams as named Respondent, as discussed below. 5 A petition for writ of habeas corpus by an applicant in custody under a state court 6 judgment shall name as respondent the state officer who has custody. 28 U.S.C. § 2242; 7 Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, Rule 2(a); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d) (providing for the 8 automatic substitution of a successor public officer for a predecessor public officer named as 9 a party in an official capacity). A failure to name the proper respondent destroys personal 10 jurisdiction. Stanley v. California Supreme Court, 21 F.3d 359, 360 (9th Cir. 1994); see also 11 Johnson v. Reilly, 349 F.3d 1149, 1153 (9th Cir. 2003) (the warden of the penitentiary where 12 a prisoner is confined constitutes the custodian who must be named in the petition). Petitioner 13 was incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison at the time the initial petition was filed. (Doc. 14 29 at 1.) Petitioner named the warden of that institution as Respondent. (Id.) Counsel state 15 that Petitioner now has been transferred to California Medical Facility at Vacaville, and is in 16 the custody of the warden of that institution. (Doc. 330 at 2.) The Court takes notice that the 17 official website of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation reflects: (i) the 18 California Medical Facility is located at 1600 California Drive, Vacaville, California, 95687, 19 (ii) the present warden of the California Medical Facility is Sircoya M. Williams, and (iii) 20 Petitioner is presently incarcerated at the California Medical Facility at Vacaville. See n.2; 21 California Incarcerated Records & Information Search (CIRIS) - CDCR [re John Lee Holt] 22 (last visited January 3, 2025); Fed. R. Evid. 201. 23 The Court’s jurisdiction over this proceeding is unaffected by Petitioner’s transfer to 24 the California Medical Facility at Vacaville. Petitioner claims that in the course of the 25 proceedings resulting in his conviction, he suffered violations of his Constitutional rights. 26 (Doc. 29 at 1-197.) The challenged judgment was rendered by the Kern County Superior 27 Court of the State of California, which is located within the territorial jurisdiction of this 1 | Eastern District of California, Rule 191(f); see also Francis v. Rison, 894 F.2d 353, 354 (9th 2 Cir. 1990) (citing Smith v. Campbell, 450 F.2d 829, 834 (9th Cir.1971)) (“[JJurisdiction 3 | attaches on the initial filing for habeas corpus relief, and it is not destroyed by a transfer of the 4 | petitioner and the accompanying custodial change.”’). 5 THEREFORE, the Court orders that: 6 1. Petitioner’s motion to substitute the Warden of California Medical Facility at 7 Vacaville, currently Sircoya M. Williams, as Respondent in place of Oak Smith, 8 Warden of San Quentin State Prison (Doc. 330), is GRANTED. 9 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to SUBSTITUTE the name of Sircoya M. 10 Williams, Warden of California Medical Facility, for Warden Oak Smith, 11 Warden of San Quentin State Prison, as named Respondent in this action. 12 13 14 IS SO ORDERED. _ 15 Dated: _ January 6, 2025 4h 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
(HC) (DP) Holt v. Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hc-dp-holt-v-brown-caed-2025.