Hazim v. Winter

234 A.D.2d 422, 651 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13031
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 16, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 234 A.D.2d 422 (Hazim v. Winter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hazim v. Winter, 234 A.D.2d 422, 651 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13031 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Yoswein, J.), dated June 27, 1995, as denied his motion for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendant Jacob Fleischer and granted that defendant leave to answer the complaint.

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the last decretal paragraph thereof and substituting therefor the following: "the plaintiffs motion for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendant Jacob Fleischer is denied without prejudice to renewal on proper papers”; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiffs motion for leave to enter a default judgment was not based on an affidavit by a party as required by CPLR 3215, (f), but rather on a complaint verified by the plaintiffs attorney. "[A] complaint verified by counsel amounts to no more than an attorney’s affidavit and is therefore insufficient to support entry of judgment pursuant to CPLR 3215” (Mullins v DiLorenzo, 199 AD2d 218, 219; see, Goodyear v Weinstein, 224 AD2d 387; Feffer v Malpeso, 210 AD2d 60; Joosten v Gale, 129 AD2d 531, 534). "Under these circumstances, entry of a default judgment would be erroneous and the judgment would be a nullity” (Goodyear v Weinstein, supra, at 387).

Although the plaintiff has not demonstrated on these papers that he is entitled to a default judgment, the court erred in sua sponte granting leave to defendant Fleischer to serve an answer without the necessary showing of a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense, and that portion of the order is therefore stricken. The plaintiff may renew his motion for leave to enter a default judgment on proper papers in accordance herewith. Bracken, J. P., Miller, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Surfside Solutions Inc. v. DNA Tech Inc.
2025 NY Slip Op 30638(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
Colonial Sur. Co. v. Lotus Global Trucking, Inc.
2025 NY Slip Op 30639(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
Metropolitan Group Property & Casualty Insurance v. Wellington
42 Misc. 3d 270 (Nassau County District Court, 2013)
NYCTL 2005-A Trust v. Davis
23 Misc. 3d 503 (New York Supreme Court, 2009)
Hosten v. Oladapo
44 A.D.3d 1006 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Taylor
17 Misc. 3d 595 (New York Supreme Court, 2007)
U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Merino
16 Misc. 3d 209 (New York Supreme Court, 2007)
Araujo v. Aviles
33 A.D.3d 830 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Worldwide Asset Purchasing, LLC v. Karafotias
9 Misc. 3d 390 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2005)
A.B. Medical Services PLLC v. Travelers Property Casualty Corp.
6 Misc. 3d 53 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Bass v. Wexler
277 A.D.2d 266 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Grainger v. Wright
274 A.D.2d 549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Finnegan v. Sheahan
269 A.D.2d 491 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Henriquez v. Purins
245 A.D.2d 337 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 A.D.2d 422, 651 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hazim-v-winter-nyappdiv-1996.