Finnegan v. Sheahan
This text of 269 A.D.2d 491 (Finnegan v. Sheahan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover child support arrears, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), dated February 10, 1999, as, upon reargument, adhered to its prior determination dated February 5, 1998, denying her motion for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendant Karen C. Sheahan and dismissing the complaint against that defendant.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiffs motion for leave to enter a judgment upon the respondent’s default in answering was not based on an affidavit by a party with knowledge of the underlying facts as required by CPLR 3215 (f). Rather, the motion was based on a complaint verified only by the plaintiffs attorney. The Supreme Court therefore properly denied the motion (see, Hazim v Winter, 234 AD2d 422; Mullins v DiLorenzo, 199 AD2d 218).
In light of our determination, we need not reach the plaintiffs remaining contentions. Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D.2d 491, 703 N.Y.S.2d 734, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finnegan-v-sheahan-nyappdiv-2000.