Hazel T. Ellis v. Frederick H. Mueller, Acting Secretary of Commerce

280 F.2d 722, 108 U.S. App. D.C. 174, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4182
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided June 23, 1960·No. 15599_1·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a civil service case, in which plaintiff-appellant’s dismissal was the subject of an extensive hearing before the Civil Service Commission under the Veterans’ Preference Act of 1944, 5 U.S.C.A. § 863, and was upheld by that body. Suit for a declaratory judgment and restoration of status was thereafter brought in the District Court. That court granted the appellees’ (defendants’) motion for summary judgment.

The function of the courts in cases like this is not to review the merits of a dismissal, but to determine whether the employee was accorded his statutory and procedural rights. See Hargett v. Sum-merfield, 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 85, 243 F.2d 29. Such rights were fully accorded here.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hazel T. Ellis v. Frederick H. Mueller, Acting Secretary of Commerce, 280 F.2d 722, 108 U.S. App. D.C. 174, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 4182 (D.C. Cir. 1960).

280 F.2d 722 (Hazel T. Ellis v. Frederick H. Mueller, Acting Secretary of Commerce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Winkle v. McLucas
397 F. Supp. 733 (S.D. Ohio, 1975)
Elmore v. Hampton
373 F. Supp. 360 (E.D. Tennessee, 1973)
Charlton v. United States
412 F.2d 390 (Third Circuit, 1969)
Martin Fass v. R. G. Ruegg
379 F.2d 216 (Sixth Circuit, 1967)
Fass v. Ruegg
244 F. Supp. 382 (S.D. Ohio, 1965)
Gardner v. Barron
240 F. Supp. 87 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1965)
Brown v. Macy
222 F. Supp. 639 (E.D. Louisiana, 1963)
Chiriaco v. United States
235 F. Supp. 850 (N.D. Alabama, 1963)