Hazel L. Glesenkamp v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.

540 F.2d 458
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 20, 1976·No. 74-2326·Published·Cited by 19 cases

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Upon the basis of the very carefully reasoned “MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER”, written by District Judge Renfrew and reported at 71 F.R.D. 1 (N.D. Cal.1976), 1 the District Court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

1

. Another of Judge Renfrew’s opinions that pertains to the controversy is reported at 344 F.Supp. 517 (N.D.Cal.1972).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hazel L. Glesenkamp v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., 540 F.2d 458 (9th Cir. 1976).

540 F.2d 458 (Hazel L. Glesenkamp v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Teltschik v. Williams & Jensen, Pllc
District of Columbia, 2010
Hoffmann v. United States
266 F. Supp. 2d 27 (District of Columbia, 2003)
Hartford Cas. Ins. Co. v. Halliburton Co.
826 So. 2d 1206 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2001)
Key Airlines, Inc. v. National Mediation Board
745 F. Supp. 749 (District of Columbia, 1990)
Amcast Industrial Corp. v. Detrex Corp.
132 F.R.D. 213 (N.D. Indiana, 1990)
Bourn v. Tomlinson Interest, Inc.
456 So. 2d 747 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1984)
Heerema Marine Contractors v. Santa Fe International Corp.
582 F. Supp. 445 (C.D. California, 1984)
Blodgett v. County of Santa Cruz
553 F. Supp. 1090 (N.D. California, 1981)
Marshall v. Heringer Ranches, Inc.
466 F. Supp. 285 (E.D. California, 1979)