Haywood v. Haywood
This text of 425 S.E.2d 696 (Haywood v. Haywood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant’s petition for discretionary review as to additional issues having been denied on 24 June 1992, our review is limited solely to the issues raised in the dissent. As to each such issue, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed for the reasons stated in the dissent by Judge Wynn, 106 N.C. App. at 101, 415 S.E.2d at 571. The case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this holding.
REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
425 S.E.2d 696, 333 N.C. 342, 1993 N.C. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haywood-v-haywood-nc-1993.