Hays v. City of Oil City
This text of 8 Sadler 185 (Hays v. City of Oil City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We cannot sustain the exception to the reserved points in this ease, since they were reserved on the whole evidence. A finding of facts by the jury would have been to no purpose, as they could not find contrary to the evidence; and a finding in accordance with it would have been a mere restatement of the testimony.
As to the remaining exception we have only to say that the learned and able opinion of the president judge so clearly and fully justifies his judgment as to leave us nothing to do but to concur in it.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Sadler 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hays-v-city-of-oil-city-pa-1887.