Hays v. City of Oil City

8 Sadler 185
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 25, 1887·No. No. 169, W. D.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We cannot sustain the exception to the reserved points in this ease, since they were reserved on the whole evidence. A finding of facts by the jury would have been to no purpose, as they could not find contrary to the evidence; and a finding in accordance with it would have been a mere restatement of the testimony.

As to the remaining exception we have only to say that the learned and able opinion of the president judge so clearly and fully justifies his judgment as to leave us nothing to do but to concur in it.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hays v. City of Oil City, 8 Sadler 185 (Pa. 1887).

8 Sadler 185 (Hays v. City of Oil City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Snyder v. Naef
389 A.2d 212 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)
Warminster Township Appeal
56 Pa. D. & C.2d 99 (Bucks County Court of Common Pleas, 1971)
Dudrick v. City of Nanticoke
47 Pa. D. & C.2d 19 (Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, 1969)
Lawson v. Allegheny County
191 A. 600 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)