Haynes v. Cain

Fifth Circuit

Haynes v. Cain

284 F.3d 604, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3441, 2002 WL 341696

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 4, 2002

DocketNo. 00-31012

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 284 F.3d 604 (Haynes v. Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haynes v. Cain, 284 F.3d 604, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3441, 2002 WL 341696 (5th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI