Home/Ohio Court of Appeals/Hayman v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Hayman v. Pennsylvania Railroad

66 N.E.2d 780, 43 Ohio Law. Abs. 598, 1945 Ohio App. LEXIS 750
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hayman v. Pennsylvania Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 77 Ohio App. 135 →
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided May 28, 1945·No. No. 3804·Published

Opinion

OPINION

BY THE COURT:

Submitted on motion of the defendant-appellee to dis[599]*599miss the appeal, because no assignment of errors as required by the Code and by Rule VII of the Rules of this Court, has been filed within the time prescribed by law and the claimed ground or grounds of error is or are not readily ascertainable from an examination of the record and the brief.

The motion will be overruled. We believe the question presented is readily ascertainable from the brief and the files in cause.

HORNBECK, P. J., GEIGER and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayman v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 66 N.E.2d 780, 43 Ohio Law. Abs. 598, 1945 Ohio App. LEXIS 750 (Ohio Ct. App. 1945).

66 N.E.2d 780 (Hayman v. Pennsylvania Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.