Hayman v. Pennsylvania Railroad

66 N.E.2d 780, 43 Ohio Law. Abs. 598, 1945 Ohio App. LEXIS 750
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 28, 1945
DocketNo. 3804
StatusPublished

This text of 66 N.E.2d 780 (Hayman v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hayman v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 66 N.E.2d 780, 43 Ohio Law. Abs. 598, 1945 Ohio App. LEXIS 750 (Ohio Ct. App. 1945).

Opinion

OPINION

BY THE COURT:

Submitted on motion of the defendant-appellee to dis[599]*599miss the appeal, because no assignment of errors as required by the Code and by Rule VII of the Rules of this Court, has been filed within the time prescribed by law and the claimed ground or grounds of error is or are not readily ascertainable from an examination of the record and the brief.

The motion will be overruled. We believe the question presented is readily ascertainable from the brief and the files in cause.

HORNBECK, P. J., GEIGER and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 N.E.2d 780, 43 Ohio Law. Abs. 598, 1945 Ohio App. LEXIS 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayman-v-pennsylvania-railroad-ohioctapp-1945.