Hayman v. Pennsylvania Railroad
This text of 66 N.E.2d 780 (Hayman v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Submitted on motion of the defendant-appellee to dis[599]*599miss the appeal, because no assignment of errors as required by the Code and by Rule VII of the Rules of this Court, has been filed within the time prescribed by law and the claimed ground or grounds of error is or are not readily ascertainable from an examination of the record and the brief.
The motion will be overruled. We believe the question presented is readily ascertainable from the brief and the files in cause.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 N.E.2d 780, 43 Ohio Law. Abs. 598, 1945 Ohio App. LEXIS 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayman-v-pennsylvania-railroad-ohioctapp-1945.