Haygood v. Younger
729 F.2d 613, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24128
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 28, 1984·No. Nos. 81-4686, 82-3111 and 82-5328·Published·Cited by 13 cases
Opinion
Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, these cases are consolidated for rehearing by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignments are withdrawn.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haygood v. Younger, 729 F.2d 613, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24128 (9th Cir. 1984).
729 F.2d 613 (Haygood v. Younger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crawford v. Parron
709 F. Supp. 234 (District of Columbia, 1986)
Nunnelley v. Douglas County
622 F. Supp. 124 (D. Nevada, 1985)
L.R. Bretz v. Zollie Kelman, Jack R. Lande, Eugene R. Welborn
773 F.2d 1026 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
James Piatt v. Ellis MacDougall
773 F.2d 1032 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
Frank Haygood v. Evelle J. Younger, and Harold Cranke and Benjamin Seymour
769 F.2d 1350 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
Ruley v. Nelson
106 F.R.D. 514 (D. Nevada, 1985)
York v. City of San Pablo
626 F. Supp. 34 (N.D. California, 1985)
Sierra Club v. Watt
608 F. Supp. 305 (E.D. California, 1985)
Waller v. Drago
611 F. Supp. 405 (D. Oregon, 1985)
Gerald Albers v. Harold Whitley
743 F.2d 1372 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
McKenzie v. Lamb
738 F.2d 1005 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)