Frank Haygood v. Evelle J. Younger, Etc., and Harold Cranke and Benjamin Seymour, L.R. Bretz v. Zollie Kelman, Jack R. Lande, Eugene R. Welborn, Donald Zeman, James Cook and the City of Great Falls, Montana, a Municipal Corporation, James Piatt v. Ellis MacDougall
This text of 729 F.2d 613 (Frank Haygood v. Evelle J. Younger, Etc., and Harold Cranke and Benjamin Seymour, L.R. Bretz v. Zollie Kelman, Jack R. Lande, Eugene R. Welborn, Donald Zeman, James Cook and the City of Great Falls, Montana, a Municipal Corporation, James Piatt v. Ellis MacDougall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Frank HAYGOOD, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Evelle J. YOUNGER, etc., Defendants, and Harold Cranke and
Benjamin Seymour, Defendants-Appellants.
L.R. BRETZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Zollie KELMAN, Jack R. Lande, Eugene R. Welborn, Donald
Zeman, James Cook and the City of Great Falls,
Montana, a municipal corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.
James PIATT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ellis MacDOUGALL, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 81-4686, 82-3111 and 82-5328.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
March 28, 1984.
William George Prahl, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., for defendants-appellants in No. 81-4686.
Jack Jacobson, Santa Cruz, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee in No. 81-4686.
L.R. Bretz, Billings, Mont., for plaintiff-appellant in No. 82-3111.
William Conklin, Gregory H. Warner, Graybill, Ostrem, Warner & Crotty, Great Falls, Mont., for defendants-appellees in No. 82-3111.
James Piatt, in pro. per.
Jay R. Adkins, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, Ariz., for defendant-appellee in No. 82-5328.
Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, these cases are consolidated for rehearing by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignments are withdrawn.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
729 F.2d 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-haygood-v-evelle-j-younger-etc-and-harold-cranke-and-benjamin-ca9-1984.