Hayes v. Decker

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Hayes v. Decker

793 A.2d 253, 259 Conn. 928, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 102

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 26, 2002·No. SC 16692·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 66 Conn. App. 293 (AC 20918), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs expert’s proffered testimony regarding the effect of discontinuation of blood pressure medication should have been admitted into evidence?”

[929] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16692. Lorinda S. Coon, in support of the petition. Decided February 26, 2002

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 66 Conn. App. 293 (AC 20918), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs expert’s proffered testimony regarding the effect of discontinuation of blood pressure medication should have been admitted into evidence?”

[929] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16692. Lorinda S. Coon, in support of the petition. Decided February 26, 2002

Hayes v. Decker, 793 A.2d 253, 259 Conn. 928, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 102 (Colo. 2002).

Pincite

793 A.2d 253 (Hayes v. Decker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related