Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Hayes v. Decker

Hayes v. Decker

793 A.2d 253, 259 Conn. 928, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 102
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedFebruary 26, 2002
DocketSC 16692
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 793 A.2d 253 (Hayes v. Decker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hayes v. Decker, 793 A.2d 253, 259 Conn. 928, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 102 (Colo. 2002).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 66 Conn. App. 293 (AC 20918), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs expert’s proffered testimony regarding the effect of discontinuation of blood pressure medication should have been admitted into evidence?”

[929]*929The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16692. Lorinda S. Coon, in support of the petition. Decided February 26, 2002

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hayes v. Decker
822 A.2d 228 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
793 A.2d 253, 259 Conn. 928, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-decker-conn-2002.