Haycroft v. . Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Co.
64 N.Y. 636, 1876 N.Y. LEXIS 142
Opinion
reads for affirmance of order and for judgment absolute against defendant on stipulation.
All concur; Andrews, J., not sitting.
Order affirmed and judgment accordingly
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haycroft v. . Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Co., 64 N.Y. 636, 1876 N.Y. LEXIS 142 (N.Y. 1876).
64 N.Y. 636 (Haycroft v. . Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'Connor v. G & R Packing Co.
74 A.D.2d 37 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co v. Croly
96 N.E. 973 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1911)
Merrifeld v. Maryland Gold Quartz Mining Co.
76 P. 710 (California Supreme Court, 1904)
Dubiver v. City Railway Co.
74 P. 915 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1904)
Travell v. . Bannerman
66 N.E. 583 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)
Breckenridge v. Reagan
22 Ohio C.C. 71 (Ohio Circuit Courts, 1901)
McCarragher v. . Rogers
24 N.E. 812 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Enders v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad
2 N.Y.S. 719 (Superior Court of Buffalo, 1888)