Hawkins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hawkins v. State

559 S.W.3d 433

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 30, 2018

DocketWD 80275

StatusPublished

This text of 559 S.W.3d 433 (Hawkins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hawkins v. State, 559 S.W.3d 433 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam:

Dequan Hawkins appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 amended motion following an evidentiary hearing. Hawkins asserts that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his trial counsel failed to object to the admission of a witness's entire videotaped statement to police. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam:

Dequan Hawkins appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 amended motion following an evidentiary hearing. Hawkins asserts that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in that his trial counsel failed to object to the admission of a witness's entire videotaped statement to police. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 S.W.3d 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-state-moctapp-2018.