Hawkins v. Pierotti
This text of 208 S.E.2d 452 (Hawkins v. Pierotti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An action by a grantor to cancel a deed conveying land, which she alleges was obtained from her by the grantees by fraud and coercion, is not a suit respecting the title to land within the meaning of the Constitution, Art. VI, Sec. XIV, Par. II (Code Ann. § 2-4902), but is an equitable action, and must be brought in the county of the residence of the defendants, as required by the Constitution, Art. VI, Sec. XIV, Par. III (Code Ann. § 2-4903). Saffold v. Scottish-American Mortg. Co., 98 Ga. 785, 787 (27 SE 208); Frazier v. Broyles, 145 Ga. 642 (89 SE 743); Chosewood v. Jones, 146 Ga. 804 (92 SE 646). The trial judge did not err, therefore, in sustaining the plea to the jurisdiction of the defendants, residents of DeKalb County, in this equitable action filed in the Superior Court of Fulton County.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
208 S.E.2d 452, 232 Ga. 631, 1974 Ga. LEXIS 1035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hawkins-v-pierotti-ga-1974.